U.S. Pharmaceutical Tariffs and Executive Order

Trishita Deb
Trishita Deb

Updated · May 9, 2025

SHARE:

Market.us Media, we strive to bring you the most accurate and up-to-date information by utilizing a variety of resources, including paid and free sources, primary research, and phone interviews. Learn more.
close
Advertiser Disclosure

At Market.us Media, we strive to bring you the most accurate and up-to-date information by utilizing a variety of resources, including paid and free sources, primary research, and phone interviews. Our data is available to the public free of charge, and we encourage you to use it to inform your personal or business decisions. If you choose to republish our data on your own website, we simply ask that you provide a proper citation or link back to the respective page on Market.us Media. We appreciate your support and look forward to continuing to provide valuable insights for our audience.

Key Provisions of the Executive Order

  • Accelerated FDA Approvals: The order mandates the FDA to streamline the approval process for new pharmaceutical manufacturing plants by eliminating redundant requirements and providing early support to domestic manufacturers. Additionally, the FDA is tasked with increasing inspections and fees for foreign manufacturing facilities.
  • Enhanced Oversight of Foreign Producers: The FDA is directed to intensify scrutiny of foreign active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) producers and consider public disclosure of facilities that fail to comply with U.S. standards.
  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Involvement: The EPA is instructed to expedite the construction approval process for new pharmaceutical facilities, aiming to reduce the time it takes to establish domestic manufacturing operations.

These measures are designed to encourage pharmaceutical companies to shift production to the U.S., thereby mitigating risks associated with global supply chain dependencies.

Anticipated Tariffs and Market Reactions

The administration has indicated that the forthcoming tariffs could be as high as 25%, aligning with those imposed on other industries like steel and automobiles. This potential increase in drug prices has raised concerns among pharmaceutical companies and healthcare providers about the affordability and accessibility of medications. Generic drug manufacturers, operating on narrow profit margins, are particularly vulnerable to such tariffs. Industry analysis suggests that a 25% tariff could lead to an annual increase of up to $51 billion in U.S. drug costs.

In anticipation of these changes, pharmaceutical imports to the U.S. surged in March 2025, with over $50 billion worth of drugs entering the country. This spike was largely driven by increased imports from Ireland, which overtook China as the U.S.’s largest pharmaceutical trade partner. Companies like Pfizer and Merck have adjusted their supply strategies, increasing air shipments and building up inventories to mitigate potential impacts.

Global Implications

Countries with significant pharmaceutical exports to the U.S., such as Ireland, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, and India, are closely monitoring these developments. India, in particular, is a major supplier of generic medicines to the U.S., accounting for approximately 31% of total pharmaceutical exports in the 2023–24 fiscal year. The proposed tariffs could disrupt these supply chains, leading to higher drug prices and potential shortages.

Domestic Industry Response

In response to the policy changes, several major pharmaceutical companies have announced plans to increase domestic manufacturing. AstraZeneca has committed to a $3.5 billion investment in U.S. production facilities, while GSK has begun constructing its sixth U.S. factory. Other companies, including Johnson & Johnson, Roche, Eli Lilly, and Novartis, have pledged significant investments to shift production to the U.S.

However, the shift to domestic production presents challenges, including the need for substantial capital investment and the time required to establish new manufacturing facilities. Analysts estimate that building a new pharmaceutical facility in the U.S. could take up to five years, a timeline the administration deems unacceptable.

Regulatory and Leadership Changes at the FDA

The Trump administration has also made significant changes to the leadership of the FDA. Dr. Vinay Prasad, a noted critic of the pharmaceutical industry and COVID-19 public health measures, has been appointed to lead the FDA’s vaccine and biotech drug program. His appointment has raised concerns among public health experts and the pharmaceutical industry about potential tightening of the vaccine approval process and reduced transparency.

Conclusion

President Trump’s executive order and the impending pharmaceutical tariffs represent a significant shift in U.S. pharmaceutical policy. While the move aims to strengthen domestic manufacturing and reduce dependence on foreign suppliers, it also introduces potential challenges, including higher drug costs and supply chain disruptions. The global pharmaceutical industry, particularly in countries like India, must prepare for these changes by exploring alternative markets and adjusting supply strategies to mitigate potential impacts.

SHARE:
Trishita Deb

Trishita Deb

Trishita has more than 8+ years of experience in market research and consulting industry. She has worked in various domains including healthcare, consumer goods, and materials. Her expertise lies majorly in healthcare and has worked on more than 400 healthcare reports throughout her career.

Latest from the featured industries
Request a Sample Report
We'll get back to you as quickly as possible