Is the AI Stock Bubble Getting Dangerous?

Yogesh Shinde
Yogesh Shinde

Updated · Nov 20, 2025

SHARE:

Market.us Media, we strive to bring you the most accurate and up-to-date information by utilizing a variety of resources, including paid and free sources, primary research, and phone interviews. Learn more.
close
Advertiser Disclosure

At Market.us Media, we strive to bring you the most accurate and up-to-date information by utilizing a variety of resources, including paid and free sources, primary research, and phone interviews. Our data is available to the public free of charge, and we encourage you to use it to inform your personal or business decisions. If you choose to republish our data on your own website, we simply ask that you provide a proper citation or link back to the respective page on Market.us Media. We appreciate your support and look forward to continuing to provide valuable insights for our audience.

Every generation of investors has its obsession, a story too big to ignore and too hot to resist. In the middle of 2020s, that story is artificial intelligence. From chipmakers to cloud platforms and data centres, AI has sparked one of the most explosive bull runs in recent memory. But with valuations soaring and hype spreading fast, it’s fair to ask: is the AI stock bubble getting dangerous?

The pattern feels familiar. When excitement turns into euphoria and investments are driven more by expectations than earnings, markets stretch beyond their fundamentals. It is a cycle the crypto investors have experienced in the past because of the significant changes in assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum price that have resulted in both innovation and speculation in the whirlwind of volatility.

The AI Hype Machine

AI’s allure is undeniable. The technology will transform the economies of individuals and revamp the concept of productivity, particularly in areas such as self-driving cars and automated healthcare systems. Investors have found opportunities in all directions, and most of them are not at fault. However, the magnitude and rate of capital inflows into AI-related equities have exceeded even the most optimistic projections.

The breadwinners, such as Nvidia, Microsoft and Alphabet, have become synonymous with this wave. Their share value has inflated not just due to good profits but also because of the perception that AI is going to be the next phase of industrialisation. However, behind the scenes, pundits are beginning to fear. The metrics of valuation are starting to run red, and the expectation is being priced as though there will be perpetual growth.

Despite this, Binance Research highlighted Nvidia’s role in the current AI vs. crypto battle for investments, and how it has become a challenge for the crypto industry: “AI vs. Crypto for Capital: A self-reinforcing investment loop in the AI sector, led by NVIDIA, is creating a powerful new competitor for investment funds that might have otherwise gone to digital assets.”

Interestingly, this speculative heat is not limited to the conventional equities. Crypto exchanges have seen an increase in AI-related tokens and blockchain projects that involve artificial intelligence. The projects in decentralised AI computing, as well as tokenised data marketplaces, have garnered the attention of investors seeking exposure to both the AI and crypto revolutions.

The Psychology of Boom Cycles

Bubbles never feel like bubbles when they’re rising, they feel like revolutions. The dot-com boom, the 2017 crypto rush, and now the AI wave all share the same energy: the belief that this time will be different.

FOMO is driving the current surge. Investors are chasing momentum, not fundamentals. Some are buying stocks just because they include “AI” in the name, ignoring whether the companies even have working products. While AI is built on real technology, hype can easily overshadow progress. That’s why diversification and discipline matter.

Why Fundamentals Still Matter For You

You should bear in mind that not every investment in AI is speculative. Artificial intelligence integration is already yielding tangible benefits in various companies across logistics, cybersecurity and medical diagnostics. Such sectors indicate efficiency improvement and increased profit margins. The threat is not AI, but rather the overvaluation of companies whose profitability has not yet kept pace with their exaggerated reputation.

Moreover, the digital gold rush and the obsession with chipmakers in the market, in particular, reflects the gold rush mentality. This where everyone would desire to possess the shovel in a digital gold rush. The most powerful companies may also become overextended when shareholders demand astronomical growth in the long run. Corrections are apt to be severe and uncertain when reality strikes, which it inevitably does.

The Binance model can offer some insight in this case. It demonstrates that both financial discipline and technological advancement can coexist, having struck a balance between innovation and responsible governance, as well as liquidity transparency. The same principle should be applied to AI investing: the growth should be sustainable, and the data should be grounded in reality.

Binance Research noted how both AI and crypto projects can be utilised together and coexist to create a sustainable internet economy: “Cloudflare’s NET Dollar stablecoin reflects the growing demand for AI-native payment infrastructure, designed to power autonomous agents with instant, transparent, and programmable transactions. It’s a bold step toward a more open and sustainable Internet economy.”

The Contribution of Regulation and Risk

As governments begin to draft AI-specific laws, whether in the form of data protection regulations or algorithmic accountability laws, the market is likely to face a new push-pull. Some business models may need to be slowed down by compliance fees, ethical limitations, and scrutiny from the populace. However, regulation is not necessarily a negative thing; it can stabilise industries that could otherwise be thrown into speculative anarchy.

In the crypto space, Binance has demonstrated how active cooperation with regulators can foster trust and accessibility on a long-term basis. The company’s programs of responsible innovation have established a global standard for responsible innovation, achieving this through its educational activities. 

Unless AI companies adhere to the same principles, including making the technology more transparent, implementing it ethically, and ensuring the impact is verifiable, they risk a similar fate to the previous tech bubbles that burst due to unregulated speculation.

What Comes Next

No bubble bursts on schedule. When there is a loss of confidence, tightening of liquidity, or intrusion of reality into the narrative, it ends. At this point, AI stocks are on an increasing trend and the market at large is still optimistic. Even then, there are warning signs of overheating amidst the blowout price-to-earnings ratios, the retail punches, and companies rebranding themselves that amount to more of a marketing exercise than an innovative one.

Learning to be both faithful and sceptical is the best advice that investors are learning. They realise that disruptive technologies are long-term projects, and not all businesses that are currently riding the AI wave will be able to survive the next recession.

SHARE:
Yogesh Shinde

Yogesh Shinde

Yogesh is an author, tech blogger, and digital marketing expert who has been writing for Market.us since 4.5 years. He is a computer engineer by profession.

Latest from the featured industries
Request a Sample Report
We'll get back to you as quickly as possible